Under criticism from all directions, Google and its adversaries have filed for permission to abandon the settlement agreement they announced last October and go back to the drawing board. They’re asking for a conference with the judge that will be used to schedule further steps in the case. This means the case is likely to stretch into next year. It’ll be interesting to see if they can put together a deal that serves the interests of the parties and satisfies at least some of the critics.
Archives
- March 2020
- November 2018
- January 2018
- September 2017
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2015
- March 2014
- May 2013
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
Blogroll
- Abstract Factory
- Andrew Sullivan
- Brad Templeton
- Cato Institute
- Daniel Larison
- Don Marti
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Ezra Klein
- Freedom to Tinker
- Gene Healy
- Jacob Grier
- James Grimmelmann
- Jerry Brito
- Jim Henley
- Jonathan Dingel
- Julian Sanchez
- Kerry Howley
- Kevin Donovan
- Larry Lessig
- Luis Villa
- Matthew Ingram
- Matthew Yglesias
- Megan McArdle
- Mike Linksvayer
- Radley Balko
- Reihan Salam
- Steve Schultze
- Techdirt
- Technology Liberation Front
- The American Scene
- Tim Wu
- Timothy Sandefur
- Tom Lee
- Washington Watch
- Will Wilkinson
- xkcd
Search
- Header picture courtesy of Pam Blunt.